Quote of the Day: “In various countries and times, leaders of groups that lagged behind, economically and educationally, have taught their followers to blame all their problems on other people – and to hate those other people.” Thomas Sowell
A number of articles to comment on today – not sure if I can get through them all. First up is the story by Liz Monteiro on Kitchener’s housing strategy for the next few years. One huge issue – I can’t read the “Wheelhouse” diagram that was printed on Page A8. Black ink on a dark blue background is not very gentle on my aging eyes. I actually had to go to the website to read it properly. But even looking at the diagram at TheRecord.com, I still don’t understand it. The diagram [actually, this is one of the few articles that you can read at the website without a subscription, interesting…] is a wheel with eight types of housing within Kitchener – homeless on one of the spokes all the way to “market home ownership” on the other. All of the other spokes are rental, supportive etc. There are two sets of numbers around that outside of the wheel and the diagrams explains that “the numbers around the perimeter of the Wheelhouse are the City’s targets” in terms of number of units per housing type while “The number within the Wheelhouse are the income deciles for Kitchener” for each of these types. O.K., got it, but the only issue here is that “deciles” means (from the dictionary, just to get this correct…) “one of the values of a variable that divides the distribution of the variable into ten groups having equal frequencies”. Ten is the “dec” part of deciles. The issue here is that there is only seven categories of income. Huh? Some planning department moron wanted to make this presentation extra special so they added some impressive sounding word – except that they can’t count to 10. Unbelievable. And doesn’t Monteiro know what deciles means? Oh, and something else interesting in this story: “On Thursday, the federal government pledged $40 Million for Habitat for Humanity to build homes for Black families in Canada.” So, can someone please look up the definition for “racism” in the dictionary? Never mind, I’ll do it: “…that a particular racial group is inferior to the others”. So, does the Government of Canada think that Blacks aren’t able to build their own homes? Flat out racism, nothing but…
What a great gig Gordon Paul has at TheRecord. It appears that his job is to scourer OPP crime reports and then copy them to his column after making humorous remarks. On Page A9, he tells us that the cops pulled over a “car” that was speeding and found 14,000 cigars that didn’t have the mandatory tax stickers. The value of these cigars was about $4 each. So, just doing a bit of quick math, cigars weigh on average about 20 grams (from my friend, Mr. Google who knows these things..). So, these 14,000 cigars weigh over 280 kilos or about 620 lbs. Now, where do you get 620 lbs of untaxed tobacco and a cigar making machine in Ontario? Oh, wait, I know…
Great story by Brent Davis on Page A3 today about The Culinary Studio. We totally enjoyed our experience there a few years ago. Excellent.
The Editorial is titled: “Waterloo Region is listening to racialized voices”. Wait a minute. “Waterloo Region is listening to radicalized voices”. There – I fixed the title for them. No need to thank me… The Editorial starts off by stating: “No government can claim to be democratic unless it listens to what the people are saying and tries to respond in a meaningful way. By this standard, democracy is alive and kicking in Waterloo Region.” Well, I don’t think that’s a very good definition of democracy. But even if it was, our elected leaders should respond based on each situation and what is being requested of them. Democracy does not respond to a group of very, very loud “activists” who are trying to influence decisions that only affects a small but vocal group of people. Everyone I know who are “racialized” (when did this ever become a word?) aren’t running around screaming to defund the police or demanding special treatment. Everyone of them are hard working parents who are trying to pay down their mortgages and sending their kids off to university. They aren’t camping in tents in Victoria Park because they have jobs and families to support. They aren’t yelling about police brutality, because they only time they have contact with the police is when their husbands play Sunday night pickup hockey with other cops in Cambridge. And the most important fact is that the “racialized” people I know aren’t shooting each other over drug deals or because one of them dissed (when did this ever become a word?) someone in an online rap video. But here is an interesting statement: “What’s needed now is for these three municipal governments to set clear goals that explain to the public exactly what they’re aiming to accomplish.” Oh really? So just what clear goals did Kitchener or Waterloo Council make when they decided to hire a million dollars a year worth of people “to combat racism and promote equality.” I didn’t hear about “goals” or how these new, unionized workers would ever accomplish this task or even how to measure success or failure of these nonexistent goals. The editorial concludes by saying: “Where this exercise in local democracy is headed, nobody knows. We sincerely hope it is toward a more equitable, inclusive and harmonious Waterloo Region.” Well, all I know is that 9 people now have jobs for life – and every last taxpayer in the Twin Cities is poorer because of it.
Mike Morrice has a column in the Insight (Huh?) Page today where he suggests: ”It’s time for a science-based climate plan”. Well, I think that all government policies should be science-based or at least evidence-based. But if that ever happened, we wouldn’t have Editorials exclaiming that “nobody knows” where a $1 Million a year policies are headed, now would we? I’m not going to go through the entire column and dissect it line by line. But the point here, if you look at all of the so-called “science-based evidence” regarding climate change, it is weak at best. If you accept the theory that CO2 emissions cause global warning, then you also have to accept the fact that western nations are and continue to reduce or maintain their emissions while the rest of the world, China and India, South East Asia and even Africa have dramatically increased theirs. Here is the issue – Morrice and others like him want to destroy Canada’s economy in the name of climate change while completely ignoring the massive increases in CO2 emissions mainly from the East. Instead of pumping out self serving op-eds in TheRecord, he should publish his column in the Times of India or in China’s Daily Worker. Oh, I also most forgot. Morrice in his call for a “science-based climate plan” in his column and then quotes some Swedish teenager. *cough* And if Morrice wants to use science-based and evidence-based policies for his climate change agenda, then maybe he should glance over this article: https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-b-c-s-failed-carbon-tax-shows-why-trudeaus-wont-work?